首页> 外文OA文献 >Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research
【2h】

Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research

机译:机构审查委员会(IRB)和临床研究中的伦理问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical research has expanded tremendously in the past few decades and consequently there has been growing interest in the ethical guidelines that are being followed for the protection of human subjects. This review summarizes historical scandals and social responses chronologically from World War II to the Death of Ellen Roche (2001) to emphasize the lessons we must learn from history. International ethical guidelines for studies with human subjects are also briefly described in order to understand the circumstances of clinical research. The tasks and responsibilities of the institutions and investigators in human subject research to preserve the safety and welfare of research subjects are summarized. Next, several debated ethical issues and insights are arranged as controversial topics. This brief review and summary seeks to highlight important arguments and make suggestions to institutional review boards (IRBs) to contribute to the future evolution of ethics in clinical research as we advance forward.
机译:在过去的几十年中,临床研究得到了极大的发展,因此,人们对遵循的用于保护人类的伦理准则越来越感兴趣。这篇评论按时间顺序总结了从第二次世界大战到艾伦·罗奇之死(2001)的历史丑闻和社会反应,以强调我们必须从历史中学到的教训。还简要介绍了针对人类受试者进行研究的国际伦理准则,以了解临床研究的情况。总结了机构和研究者在人类学科研究中维护研究对象的安全和福利的任务和责任。接下来,一些有争议的道德问题和见解被安排为有争议的主题。这篇简短的综述和摘要旨在突出重要的论点,并向机构评审委员会(IRB)提出建议,以随着我们的前进为临床研究中伦理学的未来发展做出贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Won Oak;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号